NCISS,
Federal Trade Commission Discuss Data
Access
On Friday,
April 8th, NCISS met with top leaders of
the Federal Trade Commission to discuss
the ramifications of the recent security
breaches at Choicepoint, banks and a
subsidiary of Lexis-Nexis. Attending
for NCISS were President, Brian
McGuinness of Florida, Legislative
Committee Chair, Bruce Hulme of New
York, Legislative Committee member,
Pierre Paret of Virginia, and Washington
Representative, Larry Sabbath. Among
those attending for the FTC were:
Director
of the Bureau of Consumer Protection,
Lydia Parnes
Associate Director, Joel Winston
(Financial Practices Division)
Assistant Director, Andrew Smith
Assistant Director, Peggy Twohig
(Financial Practices Division)
Associate Director, Lois Greisman
(Planning and Information Mgt. Division)
Assistant Director, Lee Peeler
NCISS
representatives expressed their concern
that as a result of the recent breaches
by data providers, private investigators
have become the victims. Many are being
denied access by data providers to
information they have long been able to
use in their investigations. This
raises restraint of trade issues.
Investigators are fearful that
legislation could further restrict
access.
Hulme
pointed out to the FTC that data
providers had moved the issue of
causation away from the security
breaches at their locations holding the
data and their lack of due diligence,
and onto private investigators as an
occupational class even though
investigators had not allowed any
breaches in their security. Information
data sellers, financial institutions and
government agencies have been the
entities that failed to secure their
data, and not
private investigators whether in large
firms or sole proprietorships.
Furthermore, ChoicePoint’s lack of due
diligence had been with individuals and
firms purporting to be collection
agencies, which are unregulated, and not
with private investigators. NCISS
questioned ChoicePoint’s recent
re-credentialing of its longstanding
private investigator client base and
pointed out that alternative controls
and measures might be instituted by
information brokers to lessen the risk
of their data being breached or being
used for nefarious purposes. NCISS
suggested that information brokers not
accept money orders as payment nor allow
the sale of data over the Internet to
the general public.
Hulme
explained how such data is used in
various investigations. He cited
examples of successful investigations of
different types, including identity
theft, fraud, location of heirs,
discovery of exculpatory evidence, and
location of criminals. Case histories,
with redacted personal information, that
had been provided to NCISS by private
investigators were turned over to the
FTC for their evaluation in order to
confirm our contention that the full SSN
and DOB are necessary investigative
tools.
McGuinness
presented information about how such
access to data serves the judicial
system in both civil litigation and
criminal defense cases. He explained how
integral private investigators are
within the court system, often working
behind the scenes on a wide range of
cases. He also described use of a
credit header search to reunite a mother
with her child who had been abducted by
the father. He emphasized the importance
of utilizing SSN searches when locating
female witnesses because of name changes
through divorce and marriage.
The FTC
attendees asked how data could be
protected without restricting those who
need the data for legitimate reasons.
They were particularly interested in
assuring that data were accessed only
for appropriate reasons. NCISS advised
them that we favor strong sanctions
against misuse of such information by
anyone, including private investigators.
Sabbath
pointed out that the majority of ID
thefts occur by low-tech methods,
including pick-pocketing, stealing from
mailboxes, theft by employees and
dumpster diving. He said that PIs
agreed that the general public should
not be able to access personal
information on the Internet and that
NCISS supports legislation to require
notice to consumers when breaches
occur. NCISS also advised the FTC that
it supports the concept behind Senator
Feinstein’s S. 115, the Notification of
Risk to Personal Data Act. He further
suggested that ID cards, including
health cards, should not display SSN’s.
Asked what
kind of information was essential to any
exemptions for private investigators in
future legislation, the NCISS
representatives suggested language based
on existing law, found in the Driver’s
Privacy Protection Act.
Discussion
was also directed toward whether or not
private investigators operating in
states without licensing should be
allowed access. NCISS advised that in
situations such as this, those
investigators could be required to sign
an agreement with the data providers
that they would voluntarily subject
themselves to the most stringent state
regulations existing. FTC officials
asked NCISS to continue to keep them
informed
Submitted
by:
Bruce H. Hulme, Chairman
for the NCISS
Investigations Legislative Committee
Email:
specialinvestigations@worldnet.att.net